Froggenivia: Overhyped or viable?
Over the past few months, the Anivia play by Henrik "Froggen" Hansen of CLG.EU has come of note to the LoL community not only in gameplay but also in the wide variety of builds he uses in competitive play. Although his build between games is rarely the same, one build that Froggen has acknowledged in a recent interview is the Tear-Mejai's-Warmogs build, which requires accumulating stacks over time compared to the conventional Rod of Ages-Deathcap rush that most other players use. The goal of today's A DIFFerent View/VVinning is to find out whether Froggen's chosen build is effective and viable, or overrated out of fan regard for Froggen's skill with the champion.
The Base Stats
The two builds that I will be comparing today are:
- Warmogs + Mejais + Tear + Elixir -- 5480 gold
- Rod of Ages + Needlessly Large Rod + Blasting Wand -- 5475 gold.
The Upsides
The Downsides:
Conclusions + Opinions
Froggen's Anivia build is risky in terms of damage output, but it is by far the superior option if you are building for survivability due to the bonus HP and MP stats that the items give. In addition, if you manage to become fed through teamfights, you will reap a greater reward than a traditional RoA-Deathcap build, especially as you add more items to your core build. You probably won't be able to score a 1v1 kill with Anivia due to her skillset, so a more teamfight oriented build using a Mejai's may be stronger on her.
I believe that Froggen's build may be more viable on Anivia compared to the traditional build, especially since Anivia is a teamfight-oriented champion with relatively low damage output compared to other AP carries. The added survivability and mana, in addition to possible cooldown reduction from the Mejai's makes it so she shines even brighter in fights and gives her a larger chance to survive after being egged. In addition, since Anivia does not heavily rely on damage to be effective in teamfights, bonus AP isn't the skill you need to max out, in contrast with most other AP carries.
TL;DR: Froggen Anivia viable.
<script type="text/javascript" src="http://www.reddit.com/static/button/button3.js"></script>
Today's post was a bit short because I've been working on BIG BLOGS as part of my Runes to Win series. (you can find the first part here and the second part here)
For more of my work:
-- Find old posts at reignofgaming.net/blogs/a-different-view/vvinrar.
-- Look out for new posts on Thursdays and Sundays!
-- Find my Item Efficiency Spreadsheet at bit.ly/mathcraft.
If you have any questions, feedback, suggestions, or post requests:
-- Feel free to find me in the "A DIFFerent View" chatroom on the NA server.
-- Leave a comment on this post.
-- Contact me at vvinrar@gmail.com

-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 6/15/2012 5:13:56 AMyou really shouldn't forget that he never bought mejais at mlg - just because it's too risky against teams such like tsm. He also builds his bird every game different and according to the enemies, which is most of times the common anivia + a warmogs. And warmogs + passive is kinda an obvious choice.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 6/14/2012 10:47:40 PMIt would be interesting if this post included a time comparison. As in how long would it take to achieve both builds with somewhat average /hypothetical CS statistics and farm. How long would it take in between the items to farm the Warmogs and Tear stacks with spells cast and minions slain. A true comparison would be taking the same two scenarios with equal farming time and seeing when both builds are finished what the stacks on ROA,Wmogs, and Tear are. I suppose for tear you could use a calculation of one cast every three seconds, especially because with Anivia it seems like it would be pretty possible post level 6 with just toggling her ultimate. The tricky part is Mejais. There is no precise way to measure this so I think it should be replaced or the post should be continued to part b/or supplemented with a chalice instead.
Nonetheless, I enjoyed the post! Thought it was very interesting and had no idea that froggen build could be potentially stronger in every aspect.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 6/14/2012 7:50:20 PMThe problem I see with Froggen's build (or, adding Mejai's in particular), is that it takes quite awhile to get fully stacked, which means the game will push into late-game, and champs can reach 6 items.
So, his core is Tear/Archangel, Mejai's, Warmog, boots - 4 slots. Meanwhile, the traditional build: RoA, Rabadon's, boots - 3 slots. Froggen's doesn't allow as much flexibility, with only 2 open slots compared to 3.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 6/14/2012 7:12:40 PMFroggen doesn't really use mejais in competitve games though. More often than not I see him with the build of Tear>Chalice>Warmogs, with other items i the middle depending on the situation. Even if it is Chalice over Mejais, I think his build is quite effective even though you don't necessarily build AP.
Anivia's base numbers and field control utility is quite strong, and because of that Froggen fixes where Anivia is weakest, which is her mana pool and survivability. Tear+Chalice is a strong combo and from my personal experience, you are much less reliant on blue buff. Warmogs is deceptively ridiculously strong Anivia, because the extra HP it gives you also apply to your passive, and the difference in survivability is huge. Of course, Anivia's AP ratios are pretty good along with the base numbers, so it is a good idea to get AP somewhere in the build eventually. Froggen builds according to how well the game is going, and most of the time you'll find him even building small AP items such as Revolver, Codex, and Haunting Guise, along with his eventual big items of Archangels, Deathcap.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 6/14/2012 6:00:34 PMIntresting that Mejais is being used again