
What's the most important thing when evaluating who is good and who is bad? It's not as easy as who does well in a specific game or, even when looking at e-Sports, a specific tournament. A player can have all the natural talent in the world, but if they don't have a willingness to practice, evaluate mistakes, and truly work to get better then they will eventually be surpassed. This applies in both solo queue and even more so in competitive League of Legends because a lot of teams only value how good a player is right now instead of viewing their top-end potential.
Asian teams do this the best, where they will pick a player who is run of the mill diamond level and might only play one or two champions at the time, but has the dedication to train hard and the willingness to take constructive criticism. Let's take a look at why the first step to getting better is changing your expectations from each game and attitude.
Winning is a by-product of playing the right way: Why it matters in Solo Queue
Doublelift has poked fun at Azubu Frost's AD Carry Captain Jack on a number of occasions, claiming he gets carried by his support and that he was overrated. These comments are always made in half-jest, but at the end of the day Captain Jack isn't a demonstrably better player than Doublelift. In fact, outside of top lane where Shy, Maknoon, and Stanley seem to be well ahead of the field, Asian teams don't seem to be significantly better at their individual positions. So why have they enjoyed the recent domination in tournaments? Simple, they don't rely on natural talent to win.

You see this sort of thing all the time in basketball and football. Professional athletes can have all the athleticism in the world, but if they don't put in the time to practice, if they aren't willing to humble themselves and get better, they don't stick. Now does this mean simply spamming lots of games? Absolutely not, because going through the motions isn't the way to get better. A player should go into a game thinking: What can I learn from this game?
If you are playing the right way winning will come, but losing can teach you much more if allow it to. Did you give up a kill early in lane? Learn to play from behind and do you best to be effective in team fights or capitalize on an opponent's mistake. Figuring out how a person beat you and being able to either mimic those tactics yourself, or at the very least avoid letting them beat you again are imperative to improvement. Were you ahead? Push your advantage and focus on how to keep your opponent behind and your team ahead throughout the game. See what worked and exploit it until someone counters it then study that.
Remember this, it's hard for a tiger to change its stripes, but it can certainly learn how to hunt better. In solo queue only so much is in your control, and if you go in and do things the right way everything else will slowly fall into place. Solo queue and competitive teams alike are much more likely to win when they aren't at each others throats calling everyone and their dog bad. Play to get better and to have fun and let winning be the by-product of those two things and watch your ELO pull a Dark Knight and rise.
Putting it into perspective for e-Sports: Long-term vs Short-term gains
Once upon a time CLG.Prime was the best team in the world. In fact, no one ever beat them and they rarely practiced because they didn't want people learning things off them. The scene largely stagnated and the talent level never really rose especially in North America for over a year. The Season 1 Championships came around and Europe plowed through and humbled an NA scene that hadn't been pushing each other to get better.
This game is becoming more and more popular in the e-Sports world, and it has much to learn from other sports. Let's look at basketball superstar Lebron James. He has multiple MVPs, was widely considered the best player in the world for several years and has been touted as "King James" ever since has on the cover of magazines as a high school student. However, for several years he was immature and unwilling to develop his all-around game and was content to rely on his natural athleticism and put up big numbers.
That didn't work for Lebron, so he left his team and joined a team with 2 other superstars and the results were the same. Finally, humbled, he worked on his low-post game and stopped focusing on stuff off the court. He went on to have one of the best playoff performance of any player in history and lead his to an NBA title all because he realized talent wasn't enough. A lot of players never have the epiphany Lebron had, and it's why all e-sports teams need to be careful when picking their players.
Teams are better off finding players that have that kind of drive, that kind of dedication than someone who might be better at this moment but doesn't want to put in the time. The parties, the stream viewers, the sponsorships, those have to be all secondary to the game because winning will bring those on faster than anything else. We are on the cusp of Season 3, where the ranked 5v5 ladder will decide who gets the last few spots in the coveted Riot salaried league. Old stalwarts in the scene like Curse, like whatever organization is sponsoring Fear this week, are going to face some new blood and don't be surprised if these teams are getting pushed by completely new faces that approach the game the right way.
So RoG'ers what do you think? How much is individual skill important in winning games and how much is it attitude and approach and what do you think we'll see in Season 3?
Follow Reign of Gaming on twitter and like us on Facebook!
Follow me on twitter here!

-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 11/10/2012 1:57:43 PMWell it's kind of hard to say on one hand there are players like Froggen and Toyz who absolutely destroy people with their vastly superior mechanical skills. They always credit their teams and superior teamwork when they win, but obviously having your ap mid dominate doesn't hurt the team's chances either.
I think team's need teamwork and they definently need to practice together, but it doesn't hurt to have a Michael Jordan or two on your team either.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 11/10/2012 2:52:35 AMOf course, if a player got an incredibly skill will carry a game, but the needed of teamplay is more important. To point an example througth soccer, FC Barcelona star, Leo Messi, carries most of their games. He makes tons of goals and assists. Same do Atletico de Madrid star Falcao, keeping up their team with his killer instint each game he plays. Tons of examples more.
But lets look last match FCB got against Glasgow Celtics: the scottish just got 1 point at their favor (fisical superiority) while FCB got more individual cuality, more velocity, more goal, and soo on. Celtics just performed an incredibly teamplay and won the match, by knowing what they can do and what they cant: lets go to defence, close pass lines, make some counterattacks and go with aereal ball. Play what you can do well, not try to do what you can't do and your cance wins grow up. If you bet for them you sure won a good amount of money. Of course, there are tons of teams who play this way against Barcelona, but the velocity at ballon than Xavi, Iniesta, Busquets, Cesc can imprime plus the superiority cuality of Messi against anybody make this plans usefull... most of times.
So if you've got some cuality, just go throught it. Don't try to fly when you are a turtle, just try to stay in your movile house, and make some bites. You can win, you can loose. But if you try to win a run against a cheetah you are going to have a very hard game.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 11/9/2012 8:30:14 PMSorry can we put Darien on that list of top laners? He's just as good as those guys (when he doesn't counterpick himself, god damn it don't pick Yorick into Nidalee). To be honest, I think the reason that Moscow 5 stand out from other EU and NA teams is because they practice so hard and probably go with the mindset that you mention in this article.
I mean Diamondprox only knew Lee Sin when he was picked up by Moscow 5 and wasn't platinum rated (afaik he was gold) so maybe you're onto something.
Good read, just remember, Moscow 5 > All.
- Euro fanboi out
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 11/10/2012 12:25:40 PMIf it makes you feel better, TPA picked Nid after m5 picked Yorick both games.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 11/9/2012 6:33:15 PMThere's a book called simply "The Book Of Basketball", where author Bill Simmons takes a look at the most succesful _teams_ in NBA history and then takes a look at the best players. Not to spoil, but one of the conclusions of this book is, among others, that Russell was an infinitely better basketball player than Chamberlain, despite the latter being the record holder in scored points, rebounds, women and boasting.
In general, team made of players who could all be rated A- but synergize great with each other will always beat a haphazard collection of A+ MVP candidates. Coaches around the world know this since forever and as LoL is becoming a sport, pro teams should also realize this simple fact and act accordingly *cough*benchhotshot*cough*cough*.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 11/9/2012 3:18:59 PMGreat article, very interesting indeed.
A player that I truly consider to be the summit of what you described regarding individual skill vs. team skill is ForellenLord, the "mighty" elo record-breaker that simply can't go anywhere with his team.
By Elo he could very well be considered League of Legends' "best player" (please note the bloody "), yet who the hell are ATN in the competitive scene? No one...
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 11/9/2012 2:34:36 PMGood article I like the focus on team cohesion rather than on individual talent. I think a better analogy would have been last decade when the Pistons (a team with no superstar but great teamwork) beat the LA Lakers (a team with 1 or 2 superstars) in 4 games.
One really important question, is what is it specifically about strong teamwork and communication that can overcome stronger individual talent. As in, exactly what is it that can allow five weaker players to overcome and defeat five stronger players?
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 11/9/2012 2:15:58 PMI wasn't aware the last salaried teams would be based on the ladder. News to me and an interesting way to threaten the established teams. In a way it's also a way to say - stop the foolish around in soloqueue and work on your teamplay.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 11/9/2012 1:24:25 PMThe asian teams are better in skill, team work and professionalism in every position. It´s that simple.
Their top-laners might be more ahead of their european and american counterparts but in mid, jungle and botlane they are better as well. Both have a lot of work to do before they can get near them.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 11/9/2012 2:08:32 PMI disagree. It's not that the successful Asian teams are just better at everything. They do one thing better though - the whole execution of the plan. If anything we see a lot of really strong top laners in different places on different teams. But as we just saw with CLG.prime and Voyboy even a good player might not mesh with the team.
I also want to point out how you fail to mention AP players, of whom we also see very strong players spread around. ForellenLord, Froggen, Alech Ich to name some. They can loose even if they win the lane and go spread terror.
And why is all this? Because the most successful teams play with a really strong team coordination. I am willing to make a bet - the most successful teams in season 3 will be the ones with the best cooperation. It might even mean my favorite team won't pull though. M5 has a struggle in bot lane, where ADC and support pulls in two different directions.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 11/9/2012 12:58:30 PMThe level of teamwork at the top level really brings home the fact that, at the end of the day, League of Legends is more about strategy than mechanical skill and individual decision making. Sure, you need mechanical skill to play out good strategies, but ultimately success is more about team cohesion than anything else. I think too many ranked players forget this, and unfortunately this misconception is only propagated by tier lists which are often misinterpreted as ranking individual champion strength rather than what they bring to the team as a whole.
To those of you who cite games in which individuals have seemingly carried their entire team, realize that oftentimes, they were only able to get in the lead because of their team's aid, and that oftentimes they were only able to carry on with their streak because of their team setting up situations in which they were able to do so. Protecting and setting up for one person to shine is merely another strategy in itself, a team based strategy.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 11/9/2012 1:02:29 PMNow, I don't mean to imply that Asian teams are simply better than the European or North American teams, but my dip into Social Psychology and many of the studies conducted in the field have shown that, mentally, there is a difference between Western and non-Western societies in terms of individual thought. While Western cultures tend to value individuality, non-Western cultures tend to think in more collectivist terms; and I believe that this may be a barrier keeping many people from reaching the top - the lack of that mindset which thinks about the team as a whole rather than considering individual contributions to a team.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 11/9/2012 1:48:16 PMPretty sure it's not a matter of Eastern/Western culture that's causes NA teams to solo queue all day instead of practicing as a team. It's just sheer laziness.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 11/9/2012 12:56:30 PMWhen teams have players that rage, blame and argue midgame you know they are doing something wrong. Those kinds of guys have a debuff aura stronger than any item in the game.
-
View User Profile
-
Send Message
Posted 11/9/2012 1:11:35 PMIf we ever get to have signatures on the GD forums, this is going to be mine.