Reign of Gaming

AD Blitz (muramana bruiser) can be fun and kinda viable - not adc.

Quote from OverlordKaelros<blockquote><h4>Quote from <a href="/members/mizary2102" rel="nofollow">mizary2102</a> <a href="/forums/strategy/champions-and-gameplay/35836-renekton-why-is-he-built-tank-i-e-the-godnekton?comment=43" rel="nofollow">»</a></h4><blockquote><h4>Quote from <a href="/members/ratzing" rel="nofollow">ratzing</a> <a href="/forums/strategy/champions-and-gameplay/35836-renekton-why-is-he-built-tank-i-e-the-godnekton?comment=38" rel="nofollow">»</a></h4><p>I'm not trying to say tank renek is dealing more single target damage. But considering the AoE you are dealing A LOT more damage than you give tanky renek credit for. I know you don't SEE this. Also it's not point blank, it's 175 range, you can easily stay in range of 2 people during teamfight.</p><p>What is false is that tank renek doesn't deal damage. He deals, a lot of it, you just don't see it 'cause it's chipping people away through the fight.</p><p>And if you stay in teamfight 10 seconds, that allows you for more AoE damage and one more stun, I'll happily take that over single target burst. You want single target burst get Kha or Zed, they're better at it.<br><br>Also, you just want Renek to be <a href="" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.lolpro.com/guides/riven&quot; rel="nofollow">Riven</a>. Unfortunately, <a href="" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.lolpro.com/guides/riven&quot; rel="nofollow">riven</a> is better at being rivien than rene.</p></blockquote><p>if you read the " right way to build <a href="" rel="nofollow" target="_blank">http://www.lolpro.com/guides/talon&quot; rel="nofollow">talon</a>" post, you would know that this guy cant accept that some thing just work only in lower elo, and that he maybe does not understand what a champion is best at. he also does not understand the difference between looking good on paper and being good in the real game.</p></blockquote><p><br>And you just want to blindly believe that the meta way of building something is the BEST way, no matter how good an argument others put forth.</p><p>I am not asking you to accept my build blindly, Im asking for you to try it out first.</p><p>Since your too much of a metasheep to even try out non meta builds,you just use your favoured respone : it looks good on paper, but is bad ingame.</p><p>By common logic, if it looks good on paper, presented in a completely logical fashion taking nothing for granted, it should be better ingame</p><p>I wanted constructive feedback,I didnt want to explain why my build is good</p><p>YOUR the one who can accept proper reasoning, and there really is no reason for you to still read this thread, as you have made it clear that you wont try it out.</p>

WTF???? BEGINNING OF THE PROPER POST---WILL LOOK AT THE QUOTE THING LATER

This is the last post I've managed to read. Already 3 pages of an underappreciated genius fighting with the whole sheep-followmeta-community.

You've given ur thoughts. Many ppl have given u theirs. Some where even agreeing with some parts of ur reasoning.
And You just stand there subborn, repeating the same all the time, while being thrown at with X different arguments.
What's more, most of the ppl here had theirs days where all they thought of was DMG!DMG!DMG! Cause it's fun and it LOOKS (I guess this is the reason you want everybody to TRY it) good.

You've never thought u may be wrong haven't u? You're the one who needs to think outside the box imo, not the rest.

P.S. Seriously, look at this forum. You coul maybe find it doesn't look like "follow meta or be damned". There are guys here who just know sth about this game already and are giving their thoughts. So maybe think deeper about them - without "I can't be wrong" attitude.

Yeah... It is. The worst thing is, one can always "prove" one champ is better then the other because he does this and that better. :/

You want ppl choosing sth over sth because it's better. Following (few iterations ahead) this logic (gotta be consistent), they are only left with what is the current FOTM.

(I don't personally like WW, but dislike arguing over somebody's pick more)

He just took matters in his own hands (right hand actually) :).

And the advices above sound good generally ;]. My past gf actually started playing - but the current one does not and I don't think it'll change - we'll see if any grudges come up..

Quote from Insanitism<p>IMO, support is a really really hard role to carry with, of course, it can be done, but unlike other roles, not the same extent.</p><p>Nonethless, as mentioned above, Xpecial, however, i heard that Carniwhore is a good support too.</p>

IMO, it's one of the most frequently repeated and toxic bullshit but nvm..

I watched a bit of Krepo - liked it - not boring while informative. Haven't watched support Aphroo yet, but after seeing his ADC stream for a few times I guess it may be nice ;]

Nobody in his right mind dares to mention Da Gravedigger ;]

Resourceless, damaging sustain on a low CD.

Quote from Deliqe »

Quote from PodziemnySamolot »

Quote from goonza29 »

 

I mean, being good in this game (like many others) means You can adapt to different situations.

No,

[...]

Being adaptive is a pretty crappy skill compared to playing overpowered champions or duo queing.

I'm kinda amazed looking at this post..

"Finding most op champions" = adapting to current flow of power.

"being a part of well coordinated team" = adapting to other team members (and vice versa).

"the biggest skill required for solo queue is finding a dedicated and skilled duo queue partner", "being a part of well coordinated team"  - this actually has nothing to do with "being good at this game".

The part concering wins as solo/duo also has nothing to do with being good or not - only with results.

Overall, I have no idea why there is a "no" at the beginning of the post ;)