Hash, sorry man, but the article is extremely ranty, this type of response should be expected when you consider the manner the article was written in.
Ranty article, will get you ranty responses. Try writing more analytical arguments if you want to get a positive response
I just said that (about Lee), and yes I agree with you
And Lee is extremely underwhelming atm, hence us not seeing his massive use. Although Lee is hard to balance with all the options he can provide. Currently RIOT really needs to address this skill vs power curve
I just reads far more "ranty" than your other work.
Although this is always going to be an issue in this game. Simple stuff has always been better, and when it's "too good" (IE - Low level players cannot counter it: Old xin, annie S1, Darius recently).
I think it could have been a great read if you got more into why those "easy" guys are easy (instead of just saying: "It's just like... there's nothing to it." "Why play something hard if you can play something easy."
And there is a grammar error too. Simply place more of an emphasis on the difference between Lee/Nasus.
Fact that you have to use the whole kit to get the most out of Lee, whereas nas only needs to hit wither and he's doing more than most ultimates in the game on a 5 second basis. That is what is separating Easy/hard. The fact that it takes far more, and than give examples of such to adequate your argument, rather than "well idk it's just easy". Some can't handle rants, I rant often, but in my work environment it's my job (as an analyst) to rant in a formulated and concise manner.
Anyways, keep up the work and get into some more details without the emotion some time, we all know it's frustrating as hell to deal with the same exact champs each game, but if it is more formed more people may take you more seriously!
I'm surprised by the lack of mention of Supports in this discussion.
When can we expect the "Part 2, ADC can only destroy lane with a support, and the way supports/junglers and gold distribution as a whole affects the gameplay in a manner that forces the lane setup we know.
Because: Balance.
Would you all play rock paper scissors for a million bucks? I didn't think so.
The game is at joke levels again, worse than BC or Mogs...
She has a very powerful lane phase that transitions even better into the mid game (with her game changing ultimate). Since she is such a bully to melee and squishy champs she wins a lot of lanes right now, making her very valuable.
I have over 20 ranked as Kayle this season, I play her anywhere I have most games logged as a mid AP though (this season). Honestly I use the same finished build (Nashors, Rageblade, Liandry's, DC, DFG) for the most part. I find that she is extremely easy to win with. Once you have a blue buff mid game you can fly all over the map with her W and you can be super clutch with your ultimate (just yesterday turned a 2 for 0 dive bot into a 3 for 2 and I got double buff because of DAT ULT).
IMO, Malady is entirely lackluster and should only be rushed if you get fed enough. Kayle's damage is coming from Q + AS/E procs. You level her R>Q>E>W, that way you can insta one target early on. Right now, IMO she is one of the best champs mostly because of versatility (can be a tanky, can be AP, can be hybrid, can be AD, can play any lane) and lane presence (I cannot tell you how often my opposing laner is typing for jungler, lol).
I forsee some changes or nerfs to her in the future.
