Reign of Gaming

i start flask, ward and pot on most tops, boots on mids without self-sustain, dorans ring on those with self-sustain, longsword and pots on adc without healer, dorans blade with healer, and fairy charm 2 greens 1 pink and two pots on supports

Pots and wards are unnecessary on most supports, you shouldn't need more than three wards (unless you are playing a very specific strategy based around that) and tons of pots arent really that great - you shouldn't be getting poked horribly as support and if you are then all the pots in the world wont help

No idea why people insist on banning or playing a small set of champions, whether they are good at them or not

i guess if i dont play shen i dont belong in this life...

Taric has one cc

Blitz has three

Explain why Taric has such a better cc score 

Please note that those who do not give me their email and other information will not be considered at this time 

please be informed that 4) asked not your favorite role, but your least favorite

I have been playing league of legends for about a year now, and since I was introduced to it by a friend, it has become the game I play the most, outclassing Minecraft and outlasting Starcraft II, my previous favorites. It takes my preferred elements from both of the above, specifically the hardcore strategy of SC II, and the teamwork component of Minecraft (I mostly played PvP and faction servers).

However, there is a problem with both of these desirable traits. They both are conditional on the team with which you are playing with; and this is really the crux of the problem. There are really three groups of people you can play with: random people, your irl or close online friends, and a team or group with which you play regularly.

Playing with your friends initially seems like the ideal option, but in reality is very situational. Firstly, all of your friends must be at approximately similar skill levels, mechanically. Secondly, your friends must be dedicated, interested and flexible enough to play at regular intervals, and play consistently well. Thirdly, your friends must be willing to accept leadership, develop and test strategies, and generally get in the team mindset. This is probably the least likely, very few friends groups will work with this. Conclusion: playing with your friends is fun, but it is more of a social game than a hardcore team/strategy game.

Playing with random people really doesn’t work. I have played with probably upwards of 8,000 different people, and of those, maybe 50 made my experience more positive and fun. You can’t get much better playing with these dysfunctional teams of people who just met each other and have an inset assumption that the majority of their team is hopelessly incompetent. Any given team will likely have someone who will rage at every mistake that is made, someone who will suicidally charge regardless of and someone who hates everyone indiscriminately. This is why playing with random people doesn’t reliably work well.

However, the majority of these people are probably decent, normal people, if it weren’t for their preexisting assumption that their teams are made of losers. Therefore, the third option comes to light. Why not establish a group of people, people who are interested in the same thing you are, from the largest possible pool available? Why not test them extensively for dedication, compatibility and amiability? Why not find a team based on the exact traits you are looking for, rather than trying to apply those traits to people who really don’t fit them?

I am seeking a group of 4-6 individuals who are friendly, innovative, and fun to interact with. I am in EST and would prefer people who have the flexibility to play at a consistent hour for a reasonable time a number of days a week. Please be over 16 years old, level thirty, and have at least 200 games (normal games are fine, this is just mechanical experience) under your belt.

If you are interested and feel like, for once in life, you would like to play without people who hate your guts, please reply with the following:

1) Email address at which you will be able to be contacted
2) League of Legends Username
3) Skype username (tryouts will be held using Skype, once a team is established, further consideration may take place regarding the choice of communication program)
4) Least favorite of the traditional meta roles, and why
5) Any additional information you think persuasive (please note that this section, like the others, is mandatory XD)

Thank you, and I apologize for the massive wall of text, I’m just rather happy to finally be doing this.

sounds interesting

I play jungle

Add me: floriansaul

Agreed, especially regarding Diamondprox

Would submit Cpt. Jack for AD, though Aphromoo is pretty legit

Would debate Toyz in favor of Froggen... Mid is pretty much just who plays the better anivia right?

Ok, I have added everyone I saw, please message me if i somehow missed you

ehh, dis forum are sucks :P