Reign of Gaming

You mean your team does and you drop a ghoul on them to secure.

You can keep arguing it, but actual play completely denies your statements.

Good luck with him I guess?

No. Yorick doesn't. Which is a main reason he isn't played hardly anymore.

He is a lane bully and ult bot.

Yorick perceived as just as damaging is because like Mundo, he takes a long time to die so that over a looong fight he does as much damage as other champions, but has no burst and no short fight steroid. He can be a front line damage sponge for a poke comp effectively, but then again, so can others, like Cho, who just do more.

He is the number one example at high end play of "Win Lane, Lose Game"

Yorick does nothing at all in a game after laning phase except ult botting. By all means, lose the lane to him and have 10 less CS, but then be on a champion that is capable of contributing late game.

Sooo Chaox, Rainman, Elementz and who else for the circle jerk theory team?

What. He's majestic as fuck now.

Dear god, are they really trying to make split push Quinn harder to deal with than CDR affected Pounce Nidalee?

You are comparing rank one of the new PBE version to rank three of the old PBE version...

Rank one of both would be the same up front 10%, but now 10% more over the duration instead.

Rank three of both would be 1% less upfront, but 28% instead of only 15% total.

Try reading it more closely.

Jesus christ. I know I've been talking about how they are nerfing Trundle with this rework... but holy shit, no need to make him an R bot like Darius or Garen to make up for him losing capability elsewhere...

I could get into the differences, but is there really a need to run through that kind of detail when the very base premise is exactly: Software cannot change emitted light in anything close to the same manner that lenses can do so. Nothing about the differences in sources changes that, in any way.

Or was that the "derail and bury actual argument in bullshit" attempt?

.... My last sentence in the post you replied to addresses everything you said completely.

The light, no matter what shade being displayed, has a co emitted light frequency that is hard for human eyes to adjust to. As exactly what you replied to says, yes tuning the colors from whites and blues of any brilliance can help, it does not do the same thing as altering the actual light that hits your eyes.

Best analogy would be, you really need stitches to close up a surgery, but you're too cheap/broke to pay for them, so you use masking tape. Can it get the job done? Yes. Is it better than nothing? Yes. Does it work the same way? NOPE. Does it perform in the same ballpark? Not close.