The system is designed to make you lose more
That's just sad lol.
Though I don't see that coming, in a losing streak now lol.
Maybe I'm really this bad, and this just provides no incentive to improve at all ._.
I know that when your MMR is bad you lose more and you win less.
But this is so ridiculous, I had my net win games in ranked increased by 10 by this week, gaining 30 lp over 7 days.
Reaching 97 lp at gold 1. Gaining 2 lp per win.
Then unfortunately I lost the following 3, and lost a total of 30 lp.
I understand the system wants me to prove myself worthy to be plat.
But this, this is just so discouraging.
My MMR shouldn't be that bad considering I win more than I lose during this week, so yeah, feels like bs.
End of QQ, thanks to those who care and read this :(
Yes, if you troll in the new system you get to play with worse players.
But you will never lose your current tier, ever.
There are SOME people who have no intention to climb and just wanna ruin other people's day by trolling.
IE:Some men just wanna watch the world burn.
It's inevitable, try doing good deeds or worship the god you believe in so that you are lucky enough not to team with one of them.
Quote from registermyaccount »
And about first picks being assholes... I totally agree. If somebody calls mid, you should respect that. I especially hate it when somebody cites the summoners code or some BS like that, and say that 'last picks must fill'. If last pick called a role, you should respect him and let him play that role. If you're especially good at mid, for example, but somebody calls mid, you can try to negotiate with him and talk over it, instead of just saying 'fk you I'm mid I'm so good that I'll never get countered". If you truly want to win, you should try to let last and 2nd last pick go top and mid every single time, unless of course, they don't want to/they aren't good at it.
Sorry, but that's the funniest thing I've read in a while. What makes you think that someone who can copy-paste "I'm mid" faster in champion select is more competent at it than your first pick, who even as determined by the system has a higher MMR than him. Or that your last pick will even counterpick the enemy champion and not just play what they want and what they are comfortable with?
Copied from the summoner's code
"Being a good team player begins at champion select. Be open minded when considering the needs of your team. If you're the last one to pick, try to fill a niche in your team that hasn't already been filled. If everyone's picked and something stands out as s deficiency in your team composition, try asking for another player to fill the gap, or change roles to embrace that responsibility yourself. Remember, that by taking on a role you don't normally play, you'll learn more about unfamiliar champions and increase your own skill level."
I first pick mid, and this is why. Furthermore, as first pick, if your champion has hard counters, you can ban them out. On top of that, the amount of wins I have been handed because someone has picked X champ or Y champ because they looked it up on counters, but do not have enough experience with that champ to out right win lane or even maximise utility and presence.
That's easy for high ranked players, since in the lower rankings there are 4 perma-bans since people don't really know how to deal with them and they are kinda a pain for solo q.
Though I'm not an expert in both roles.
I'm suprised nocturne's not mentioned.
Yeah I noticed it's based on a ratio rather than a solid number, just curious about the ratios.
Is it just me or red ribbons are extinct now in ranked lol.
Thx for the info though, points out most of the things with the approval of a red too.
Well, if you fight against someone with equally skillful they'd have their way to deny your cs as your counter. The ways can differ a lot from bronze to diamond. Supposedly the higher ranked people should be more skillful in denying, so if you have the skills which par with the higher ranked, you will know how to survive through lane phase, not falling too behind in order to have presence in teamfights. Else, the denial would have its effects as you do not possess the skills or knowledge to react right when the enemy is attempting to harass you every time you cs. (EG: If you're a smarter garen than a kayle at top, you'd know you should only use your Q when kayle uses reckoning in order not to be kited forever and forced out of lane, derpy example but should explain the thing :P)
It exists that's why I said otherwise lol.
If you have a higher skill level than your opponents in this ranking then you'll climb. No matter you're countered or not.
If you don't, you'd probably fluctuate at where you are until you improve in fighting counters so you can dominate the field even if you have a disadvantage at champ select. Since there's bound to be quite a few matches that your champ is fighting a natural counter.
Since we're talking about counters here, that statement is based on the situation where you're countered in matches in your way to climb the ladder and to refute "counters don't matter".Cause if you aren't countered or countering people, of course you can have no problem winning without superior skills over your foe. When you do get countered, You'll need a skill level above what that of people in your current ranking in order to even win the lane, so as to not lose the game and fell off the ladder. Feeders don't count.
Maybe I'm wrong, but this is what I think :)